Friday, March 30, 2012

Pursuing Seminary: 567 questions to inventory my personality

After I finished all the online psych tests, next up was the MMPI-2 (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2), a 567 true/false question test. The test was proctored at a psych office in New Brighton, which is apparently where all seminary prospects go to get psych-tested. It took me an hour and twenty minutes. Could have been done in less than half that time if it were electronic, but no, they require old-fangled #2 pencil and bubble-sheet answers.

Here are some example true/false questions from the test: (these are easily findable on the internet, so I'm not worried about divulging trade secrets)

  1. I like mechanics magazines
  2. I have a good appetite
  3. I wake up fresh & rested most mornings
  4. I think I would like the work of a librarian
  5. I am easily awakened by noise
  6. I like to read newspaper articles on crime
  7. My hands and feet are usually warm enough
  8. My daily life is full of things that keep me interested
  9. I am about as able to work as I ever was
  10. There seems to be a lump in my throat much of the time
  11. A person should try to understand his dreams and be guided by or take warning from them
  12. I enjoy detective or mystery stories
  13. I work under a great deal of tension
  14. I have diarrhea once a month or more
  15. Once in a while I think of things too bad to talk about

Of course, my favorites were the ones later on, things like, "I hear voices" and stuff.

The results from this test are interpreted by the psychologist, with whom I met on March 14th. That's coming in a later blog post.

Thursday, March 01, 2012

Pursuing Seminary: Psych Evaluation

I finished reading all my ELCA candidacy materials (um, actually that's not true - they gave me a book to read, which I've not yet cracked open, but I DID read all the packets and sheets of paper in the folder from my candidacy conversation earlier this week!). And even though I've yet to complete my official application with the synod, I've already started working on the psych evaluations. It's a good thing no one told me how long they were before I started, otherwise I might have been scared away.

The folks determining my craziness/sanity are the North Central Ministry Development Center. On their page for "Candidate Registration" are 8 required forms that need to be completed. That's just step 1. Once those are done, there are three personality inventories that need to be completed, one in person at the center in New Brighton (or with a proctor, like a pastor), and the other two online.* THEN, after ALL that is done, I'll have the real, three-hour, in-person psych evaluation.

* Their website says one online and two in-person, but the email I got had links to two online tests, so I don't really know.

Let's talk about how much time this has taken so far. Just to be clear, I'm not complaining about it, I'm documenting this in the hopes future seminarian hopefuls might find it useful.

Of the initial 8 forms, three have to be printed, signatured, and snail-mailed/faxed/delivered. Those were easy, because it was literally just a signature and date. Those forms give the Center permission to release my information back to the synod, and also say that I understand their privacy policy, etc. Short, simple, sweet, done.

But the other five forms. The first was short, biographical, who-are-you kind of stuff. The rest were beasts. For example, they asked "What persons, places, events, and/or experiences in your life have shaped your faith, and your decision to pursue a church vocation?"

Yeah, because that'll be a short answer. This was followed by two dozen more questions of near-equal breadth, such as "Describe your relationship with your father and your feelings about that relationship:" and then there are three boxes, for Childhood, Adolescence, and Adulthood.

My favorite question, though: "Estimation of time spent on this questionnaire". 2 hours.

Fortunately, the rest were shorter. Next up was "complete these sentences", with prompts like:
  • "My greatest fear" (I answered "Failure. Being left alone. (these serious fears are followed by a more facetious list including: worms, dogs, and small children)"
  • "I can't" ("read minds. I REALLY wish I could.")
  • "When I was a child" ("I thought as a child, but in too many areas, I haven't given up my childish ways. Maybe my inner child is a good thing, though.")
And many, many more.

Next up, medical form, easy, done. Then. Another hard one. List 25 accomplishments. I thought that would be easy, but one of my weaknesses (and I've known this for a long time) is coming up with examples on the spot. So, think of 25 things I've done? Uhhh... I've done... stuff...?

I ended up including a lot of work-related stuff, and probably not enough ministry-related feats. Then I had to write about my top 5 accomplishments. Example:

SIGNIFICANT ACHIEVEMENT: Developed an online back-to-school forms database for my school where I work; this was and remains a huge deal.
My school where I work used to send out a ridiculously large packet of back to school papers to parents over the summer. Not only was this expensive, but there was no way to track who was missing a form, who hadn't turned in any forms at all, and no easy reporting mechanism to collect all the data. Many of the offices needed to re-type the data into their own spreadsheets, which is prone to all sorts of human error.

I came along and said 'we can do this better, we can do it online, and I know I can code it.' It was a very very stressful summer, and gosh I learned so much about dealing with users, both the parents who filled out the online forms, but mostly the nurses and principals and deans who used the information on the back end. Lots of meetings went by, and eventually I had a finished product.

Over the years since, this online registration system has completely changed the way we operate. We now do class registration, summer school registration, all sorts of medical and volunteer forms, etc, all online through the system that I built. And I provide several dozen custom reports for departments all over the school. It's pretty awesome. For me to impress even myself is significant. This is one of those achievements.
Lastly on that form I needed to list my personal skills, strengths, and areas for growth, based on these accomplishments. The whole form probably took another hour. I couldn't resist, as my 25th accomplishment, I listed "Completed the last of these psych veal forms :)"

With all that finally done, this morning I called and scheduled my in-person inventory, and got a slot for tomorrow. They also emailed me links to the two online inventories that I need to do, so I started on those tonight. The first one was a Strong's Interest Inventory, consisting of about 300 questions on how well I like certain activities, how much I'd desire particular careers (regardless of current ability), etc. It was lengthy, but [relatively] quick.

Next up are 325 questions for something called a "PEPQ", which according to Google stands for "PsychEval Personality Questionnaire". These appear to be eye-doctor questions, because you're supposed to choose an either/or answer (there is a middle answer labeled "?", but the directions discourage using it). Here we go. Get 'er dun!

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Pursuing Seminary: Candidacy Conversation

This morning I sat down with Glenndy Ose, Bishop's Associate in the ELCA Minneapolis Synod, to chat about my decision to pursue seminary. They call this a "candidacy conversation", and, as promised when I made the appointment, it truly was casual. I felt no pressure to answer "correctly", just got to be myself, talk about my path to ministry, what I'd like to do after seminary. Afterward Glenndy gave me a road-map of my journey from now until I officially get ordained in the church.

And as I learned, this road has a lot of paperwork. I left the synod office with a folder full of papers to read and a few checklists of papers to turn in. Unfortunately because of the timing for the required psych evaluation, my ducks won't all be in a row until well after the April interview date, so I won't do my panel interview until June 7. Presumably. That's assuming everything goes smoothly between now and then, and that I'm not out of town that week. Otherwise we're looking at August. The panel interview consists of 4-5 folks from the ELCA (though most likely not Glenndy; she said she's usually only on panels for the more "dicey" candidates... so I know if I see her on my panel I'm in trouble :)

As I was leaving, Glenndy commented that I was "fascinating". I replied, "I think that's a good thing?", and she reassured me, "Yes it is. Because if I'd said 'interesting' that'd be more questionable". I think that means I "passed", not that this morning was an exam, moreso in the sense that at least one person in the synod so far thinks I could be a good fit, and I find that affirming.

My next steps: complete a bunch of paperwork for the ELCA, complete a psych eval, and then... um, that's all I've got right now. I'm sure one of these papers says what comes after that, but let's just focus on one step at a time.

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Why I make movies

There are a lot of reasons I love making movies, but sometimes the most rewarding feelings I don't encounter until we're done shooting. This is from a high school hockey coach whose team helped us out as background actors for our hockey scenes. Unbeknownst to me, one of the girls' friend's dad died the day before we shot our scene, and the entire team was having a rough time coping.

I believe everything happens for a reason, and I couldn't think of a better situation for them than the situation you provided on Thursday. You helped them feel important, take their minds of sadness and focus on fun, and really just gave them a life experience that some of them will never have again.

Making movies has a lot of meaning in my life. It means even more when, somehow, God can use it to minister to others.

Monday, February 13, 2012

Pursuing Seminary: Step 1

It's all Peter Christ's fault.

Actually not. Fingers must also be pointed at my other seminarian friends: Marissa, Becca, Emmy, Grace, Julia and Zach, and Tim;* and at so many pastors who have influenced my life for the better, who have each, in their own way, pointed me this direction: Al Neibacher, Norm Kretzmann, Bob Farlee, Martin Seltz, Dave Elliott, Dan Bergstrom, Jeff Crafton, Bruce Benson, Jennifer Koenig, Will Healy, Dave Olson, Rolf Olson, Andy Nelson, Lew Anderson, Mike Wiens, Jon Anenson, and of course, Greg Meyer and Dawn Fuglestad.

But having coffee with Peter last week is what tipped me over the edge. I've pined over seminary for a long time. The idea and I have had a roller coaster love-hate, envious-but-terrified relationship for years. Time to turn words into action.

Who knows if the ELCA will take me or not. I guess I'll find out. Today I took my first step toward seminary: scheduling a "candidacy interview" for the morning of February 28.

Welcome to another adventure.


*to all my friends who have gone before, now is when you should probably warn me to run away screaming :)

Sunday, February 05, 2012

Fake it 'til you make it

Last week my best friend Matthew hired me to help run auditions for The Invitation, a short movie being shot in Minneapolis later this month. I wrote and posted the casting notice, and corresponded with the director, Brad, an LA veteran of 7 years, as he selected actors to come in for auditions. This was my first experience setting up a project in Matthew's online database, so I was kinda nervous about getting everything perfect. (let's be honest, when am I not nervous about getting everything perfect?)

A cool part of my experience: Brad asked Matthew and me to chime in if we saw an actor submit that we knew would be a good fit for the role; when I saw the lead actress from my last movie shoot had submitted, I took him up on that offer. Because I knew if she came in to read, she'd almost certainly land the role. I was right :) The director was blown away by her audition, and I just got the email saying she's officially been cast.

Above all else, that right there is why I want to do movie-making: for the purpose of helping others. Matthew went out of his way to give me hand-ups into the movie biz, and I love having the chance now to pass that on.

So for auditions: I scheduled all the actors, dealt with a couple scheduling conflicts, and then when we discovered a glitch in the scheduling software, personally called another 5 people to invite them to auditions. Brad had written to me "if it doesn't work out it's not a big deal. These things happen." I wrote back, "Yeah things happen, but I'm a perfectionist". It was great being able to show off my work ethic through action, more than just words. I got 4 of those 5 actors there that night.

When auditions ended, Brad and I talked briefly while I packed up the camera and laptop gear, and I mentioned to him, 'if you need more people on your crew, I'd love to help out'. We got to talking, him asking what I liked doing, me replying some combination of production manager/producer/AD type stuff, and he lit up and said "that's exactly what I need!" So by the time we left, I was unofficially hired as Line Producer.

I've never line-produced before, but when Brad and I met yesterday to run through the tasks I'd be responsible for, it's all stuff I know how to do, or can figure out easily. This production isn't huge, in fact, it's slightly smaller people-number-wise than my last movie. But we have a real budget this time, we're actually paying people (and getting paid), and doing more advanced paperwork than I've done in the past. So for me it's an appropriate step up to the next level, a step up for which I've been longing. Best part: it's a short shoot, only 5 days, so getting the time off-work wasn't an issue. My boss is very supportive of my movie-making projects, which helps.

February will be a really great month. From running auditions last week, recording ADR with one of our actors from Vacationers (that we shot last February), production-managing the Madrigal Dinner at Minnehaha later this week, line producing The Invitation later this month, having our first AWAKEN performance the last weekend this month, and somewhere in there coordinating the last few post-production details of Vacationers (sound and color correction), I've got lots of production work on my plate, and that's how I like it.

Saturday, February 04, 2012

Paintings have arrived!

The paintings I bought on my last trip to Burbank arrived yesterday in a HUGE box. Here's what they look like, all framed and hanging on my wall.



Three Rules of Life

When I think about how to live a good life, I can sum it up in three rules:

1) Don't be an idiot*
2) Do it again, but don't suck this time
3) Don't settle

*Alternately, as my friend Jenny says, "don't be a douche-tool". This version applies mostly to romantic relationships, but could be more widely applicable to friendships and acquaintances, as well.


Let's "unpack" each of these.

Ugh, no, let's not unpack. I hate when people (usually pastors) say they're gonna unpack something. That's what I do to my luggage, not English.


1) Don't be an idiot

Essentially, don't do something you'll regret in the morning. Bite that tongue. Don't make stupid decisions that you know will haunt you, get you fired, land you in jail, or estrange you from your lover. Recognize when you're being irrational, and don't be afraid to back down when you realize you might be wrong. (easy to do, right?)

I guess another way of looking at it: while it's okay to dance as if no one is watching, you ought live as if everyone is watching, as if your life is being recorded. People gossip. Remembering that'll help keep you honest.

Lastly, don't let greed take control. Lyrics from The Gambler apply: "Know when to walk away, know when to run". Recognize when the deal (financial, business, personal, relationship, this applies in every area of life) is as sweet as it's going to get, and then either accept it or walk away. Be fair to yourself, but don't be greedy, or you'll risk losing that deal/business/friendship/relationship/etc. And know that sometimes it's better to walk away.


2) Do it again, but don't suck this time

I think I got this one from my friend Shawn, but that might be a mis-memory. In any case, "do it again but don't suck this time" quickly became my motto on movie sets when I direct actors, and has since crept into my everyday vernacular.

You're gonna make mistakes, it's fine, everyone does. Even me, occasionally. Making the mistake isn't the problem; learning from and responding to it, that's what matters. I believe in a God of second chances. And third and fourth and fifth. But when I get that second go, I'd better aspire to do better, or at least suck less, otherwise I haven't grown, so what's the point?

Over time I've noticed some folks in my social circles choose to live in the past, rehashing old stories over and over, either A) wallowing in their misdeeds and mistakes, or B) escaping to a yesterworld of fond memories "when life was good"; in both cases, they choose the past over living their present-day lives. I think that's unhealthy. Story-telling and reminiscing can have a healthy place, and learning from what you've done well and not-well is awesome! But escapism, choosing to trap yourself in your past at the expense of your present... life's too short. Learn from the past, let it inform and mould you into a better you, and then live your life as a better human being because of those experiences.


3) Don't settle

I don't remember many details from the 25 hour audiobook biography of Steve Jobs, but the one phrase that has stuck with me is Steve's philosophy, "don't settle." It struck me because it's the life motto I've always lived by but never had words to express.

"Don't settle" is globally applicable: work, human relationships, romance, movie projects, personal improvement, faith, et al.

There's a fine distinction here I'll try to describe. Example: my first two movie projects. Given the tools and experience and circumstances I was working with at the time, I'm proud of them. They are far from perfect, but at the same time I would never say I "settled." Same with some of the web-based database tools I've built at work. Not perfect, but I never settled and said "this is good enough" until I pushed through and made it as great as I possibly could. And same with my close friends - I will never have listened enough, asked enough questions, loved enough, shared enough of life together; at the same time, my goal at the end of the day is to say "I've done what I could."

With all of these there comes a point where one feels complete, but I've only ever reached that point by pushing myself beyond what I thought I could do before. Giving up halfway, settling for something less than I knew was my personal best, that leaves me feeling hollow and incomplete.



There you have it. Jeremy's three rules by which to live. Maybe I'll add more in the future, but I'm thinking everything else can be umbrella-d under one of these three.

Monday, January 16, 2012

Artwork and Scientology

I’m in Burbank, and yesterday morning I went on a doggie walk with my friend (poor phrasing, I mean we walked her dog). On my way back home I walked by an art store, one that’s intrigued me since my very first visit to LA 15 months ago. I’ve never been sure what to think about it, because on the one hand it looks kinda shady, hole-in-the-wall-esque; on the other hand, [potentially] like a great place to find deals. Because I like art. Or at least, paintings of landscapes and nature. And over the last few months I’ve been longing to buy another piece or two to hang in my living room.

So with nothing else to do this morning (Baby Jesus cried, I skipped church, not having a car to get to the one in Pasadena that I love), I decided to stop in the art store and just check it out, see what there was to see. I didn’t really expect to buy anything, but if I saw the right piece, then sure, why not?

I entered timidly, and cheerfully greeted the guy at the front desk. Michael. He welcomed me with a warm, soothing voice, asked if this was my first time to the store, to which I answered affirmatively. He offered me a drink: tea, cocoa, water; asked if I needed a restroom; then we talked for a short while, him telling me about the store, me describing my love for scenic landscapes, and eventually we made our way into a room with hundreds of canvas original paintings lying in piles around the room. One by one he went through a pile, me admiring each piece, and every now and then I’d ask, “set that one aside” for us to review later.

Before we had started looking, Michael said something that really captivated me: (voice note, so exact quote)
When you look at something, it happens immediately for you…. there’s no thinking involved. If you have to think about whether you like something or not when you’re looking at it, then you’ve spent too long looking. In other words, I’m saying if you trust your judgement, if you trust your own immediate perceptions of who you are as a being, and what works for you, that’s as good as it ever gets.
And as I asked about prices, mentioning maybe I’d need to save my pennies and come back next time I’m in town, he noted that while the store would be here, specific art pieces might not be - if I like it, I should really get it now, even if I have to put it on layaway. “Anything you like, and you leave, there’s a good chance you’re gonna lose it…. Do something about it today, whatever it is.”

Because it’s been on my mind, I found myself drawing parallels between what Michael said about art as being directly applicable to Love. I was moved.

After seeing a hundred paintings, (maybe two hundred? maybe more?), I’d selected a dozen to review: several mountain landscapes, some palm trees on a beach, a cityscape, some leopards, and a still-life of a violin. Then we stepped into their viewing gallery, complete with elegant red recliner couches and chairs for sitting back and admiring the artwork, which Michael carefully taped on a white wall illumined by gallery track lighting. I looked at six paintings at a time, eliminating them from my selection one by one. And during this, Michael brought me a cup of tea and some bread and cheese to munch on while I pondered. I’m not used to this kind of treatment! He explained this is how his parents raised him: when someone comes to your home, you offer them food, drink, bathroom, anything to attend to their needs. It’s how he was raised, and how he lives his life now. I really appreciated that.

Narrowing from 12 excellent paintings down to 1 was not easy. Of the first six (all taped on the viewing gallery wall), I eliminated two right away, not because they were bad, not by any means! But because I didn’t love them as much as the other four I was looking at. But then there were two palm tree paintings, both spoke to me differently. I’ve never been good at art critiquing, but I saw in myself how these two paintings evoked very different emotions. Both had three palm trees on the left side, and both skies were sunset, but the ocean water and land composition was different. One had rough water cresting on the beach, and the water was surrounded by land on both left and right. It made me feel comfortable, cozy, cocooned, wrapped, enveloped. Safe. The other had no land on the right side, just wide open (mostly calm) ocean waves. It made me feel uncertain, almost scared, at the same time exhilarated at the possibility. It was symbolic of my future. It also made me feel brave, like I could dive into the deep and there was nothing wrong with that. It was the same beach, the same palm trees, from two different views. Perspective made all the difference. After a lot of thinking, and mostly feeling, I eliminated the enclosed, safe-feeling one. Time to take a risk.

Michael was clever in how he helped me eliminate paintings. While I agonized over the palm trees, he asked, “well how about this [completely other] one, do you like it better or less than the palm trees.” “Well played,” I told him. Because when asked that way the answer was obvious: I loved the palm trees more, so the other painting could be dismissed. I commented that he’s clearly done this before, and he explained his role isn’t to decide for me, but to help me come to the right decision for me.

Eventually, after some easy decisions, and a lot of hard ones, I narrowed it down to three: two with mountains and the one with palm trees by the wide-open ocean. The two mountains were very similar - same artist and I suspect the same mountain, but one was light, happy (“safe”) blue, daytime colored, and the other red and orange and yellow, sunset colored, more fire-y, more exhilarating. Both were beautiful, both were very “me” and my decor.

At this point, I munched on my bread and cheese while Michael moved these final contenders to the lower half of the wall, and found wooden frames to set in front of each, so I could see how they looked.

They looked beautiful, and I wanted all three.

And while I was VERY tempted to take all three home with me, I forced myself to make a sacrifice, and I turned down the palm trees, leaving the two mountains on the wall. And then I couldn’t prune any more. I decided, if I could afford it, these two would come home with me.

Even before we’d started looking at paintings, Michael had reassured me not to worry about the cost - he described a layaway program they have, and also mentioned there might be room for negotiation on the final price. I knew with the current “liquidation sale” discounts these paintings would all be in the $150-$400 range, plus the cost of framing, so that gave me a ballpark. But in any case, I understood that it wasn’t about the money. This felt very comfortable to me, because it’s how I operate, too.

With the final two paintings selected, my guide through the art world priced them out with the same wooden frame he’d used for the demo. Once I saw the numbers, I asked if there were other framing options - he immediately jumped in, saying if I was worried about the price– I cut him off: “No, it’s not that, I actually want to get something nicer, this frame looks cheaper than what I have on my art at home.” I went into their custom framing room and found a frame that looked similar enough - deep, rich, elegant wooden - to what I had at home, and as it turns out, that choice wasn’t significantly more expensive.

With a final quote prepared, it was a little higher than I’d hoped to spend. On the plus side, because they were billing and shipping to me in Minnesota, there was no sales tax. On the down side, there was a significant shipping charge. I hemmed and hawed a little bit, then, as humbly as I could, because I knew everything was already on sale and discounted (even the framing), I asked if there was any chance they could slash the price slightly more.

Michael said “let me check”, then brought in his manager and described my situation. The manager offered me a $30 discount, which I might have taken, but I asked if he could drop it even more - I named a price, and said if he could meet it, I’d pay the whole amount right there, right then, no lay-aways required. He shook my hand and said “enjoy your art.”

Win. Two beautiful paintings, framed, delivered to my door in Minnesota. Did I mention, original paintings, not prints. Michael wrote my order number and the date on the bleed over edge of the canvas, then handed me the pen to sign my name - point being: when they arrive, I can verify these are the originals I picked out, not duplicates.

He also let me pay with two credit cards, which means I’ve now spent enough on my new American Express card to get a free flight’s worth of Delta SkyMiles bonus points, and racked up a few extra Southwest miles on my Chase Visa, to boot. If I can keep working within the system, I may never need to pay full price for a flight again.

Receipts in hand, I started toward the door. On my way past the front desk area, Michael brings me to a stand with some DVDs and pamphlets, and I see right away the DVD on the top of the pile says “Scientology”. Oh great. Such a great morning, why ruin it with this?

The situation turned out not as badly as I feared, He told me a bit about his background, growing up Jewish, and his conversion to Scientology, and along the way we shared some ill-will toward organized “religion” at large. He seemed more interested in what Scientology teaches about interacting with people, vs promoting the religion itself and trying to “convert” me. My first thought was “this makes me feel uncomfortable”, but then I asked, “Okay God, I’m in this situation, anything you’d like me to say?”

As he talked Michael cited Jesus’ saying, “I am the way, the truth, and the life, no one comes to the Father except through me.” There came a point in the conversation where Michael said, “okay, now your turn to talk and me to listen”. This caught me off-guard, but I latched onto that verse that he’d quoted and said, “you know, Michael, you’ve talked about wanting to make up for past deeds, to earn God’s love, and brother I just want to tell you that price has already been paid; the verse you cited before, Jesus being the way and getting to the Father through Him, stop putting so much pressure on yourself, you don’t need to earn anything. God’s so proud of you, of the man you are, the kind of man who offers his guests food and drink…blah blah blah” I said more, but that’s the gist of what I remember.

I don’t know if it meant anything to him, I don’t know if he truly “listened” or was just humoring me, but he got a little teary-eyed so I’d like to believe it meant something. The words weren’t mine, and they kept coming.

At the end of the conversation I asked if I could pray for him; he consented, I did, and then left. So weird, going from learning about art (and even learning how to appreciate impressionist work), to talking about Jesus in a public storefront, and feeling comfortable doing it. I figured if he was going to “Scientologist” me, I would “Jesus” him in return. Not about conversion. That’s not up to me. It is about reminding God’s children how much they are loved. Being counter-cultural.

Drive-by ministry. This is my Calling.

Sunday, January 01, 2012

Goals update for 2011-2012

Some people call them New Year's Resolutions, but because I work in a school I set my goals in summer. Let's check in and see how I'm doing (considering I've forgotten completely what I had planned to be working on this year)


Play guitar more often, even when I don't "feel" like doing it
Fail.


Learn basic chords on my banjo, even if I do not become an expert
Fail.


Continue working toward my CD album
Fail.


Finish post-production on The Vacationers, Paperclip, and start working again on Far Away
Progress, and hopefully both Vacationers and Paperclip will be done by summer. So, "not fail".


Read at least 1 more book
Well, if audio books count, then I've read FOUR! The Hunger Games trilogy, and the Steve Jobs biography.


Let God start leading and stop trying to force it
Constant battle, but I've drawn back quite a bit and am letting come what may.


Prioritize friends over work
Yes. Definitely done this. To the detriment of myself sometimes, though.


Keep diving straight into deep questions
Hm. I've grown a tad more confident in myself in starting conversations, but maybe not so much in the area of deep questions. I'll work on it.


Explore the wonders of Netflix
Done. I have large DVD and instant queues.


Discern my calling to Los Angeles, and what I hope to accomplish
Nope. Good thing the year isn't over yet.


Be honest with myself
Yes. I am this, if nothing else.


Become a more persuasive speaker
Fail.


Eat healthier and exercise, even if it's "just" going on more walks
I need to get out walking more. I wouldn't call my diet a smashing success, but small steps toward progress, perhaps.



EEK. Long way to go in the next 7 months.